On Human Relations with Other Sentient Beings
  • Home
  • The Blog

Speaking Hypothetically to Creaking Hypotheticals

9/23/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
Not everything Mr. Tobias Leenaert says is dreadful. For example, one of the most sociological things he tells audiences is that “most people eat meat because most people eat meat.” That is a fairly neat way of stating that the majority of people have a tendency to bow to the dominant norms and values of the societies in which they are born and grow up in.

Mr. Leenaert also believes that animal advocates – and perhaps all social movement participants - should work on their communication skills. For those seeking widespread cultural change in the absence of immediate revolution, these are wise words.

So not everything Mr. Tobias Leenaert says is dreadful.

Where it all goes rather pear-shaped is when he seeks to attack and undermine the philosophy of veganism, in the name of his version of flexi-veganism. One way he does this is to insist that to talk about veganism in other terms than it being “about food” is a mistake which will backfire on advocates attempting to “ripen up” the public to the original justice-for-all vision and scope of the philosophy.

Because of his habit of seeking to attack and undermine the philosophy of veganism, it is fair to say that Mr. Leenaert and I do not get on very much.

I particularly object to him encouraging people to think about veganism in a shallow, impoverished, way; and the fact that he’ll actively suggest to vegans that they should consume animal produce in some circumstances. Only a few weeks ago in the ARZone Facebook group, he was busy telling a vegan that eating bits of other animals was an acceptable thing to do.

However, this one-on-one “advice” is rare – usually, Mr. Leenaert constructs what’s become an increasing bizarre set of hypothetical situations which encourage the conclusion that the “best” course of action is for vegans to consume food items that come from other animals who have had their rights violated. These hypotheticals are delivered to audiences in conference talks, speeches, and “workshops” that appear to be largely attended by young and possibly impressionable animal advocates.

Essentially, his position amounts to this: animal rights violations now for a better future.

Before we discuss some of these hypotheticals in details, one general point should be made. They all seem to be constructed in such a way that vegans are inevitably caught on the horns of a moral dilemma that suggests to them that the safest course of action is to deliberately  eat products made from the exploitation of other animals. They are carefully formulated in order for Mr. Leenaert to suggest that vegans should participate in processes that violate the rights of other animals.

There is little to no suggestion that they are drawn up in order to help vegans explore solutions to the prospect of “having” to eat animal produce. The hypotheticals presented by Mr. Leenart are not designed to allow vegans off the hook but to firmly impale them on it. He apparently wants to devise situations where vegans feel justified in eating other animals themselves, or sanctioning the eating of animal produce in others. They are designed in such a way that the vegan feels virtually compelled to go against their own values and beliefs.

One example involves a being Mr. Leenaert calls “this rabbit.” The situation is constructed thus: a “normal omnivore” declares that they are willing to consider becoming a dietary vegan but there is a problem. A relative whom she does not want to hurt consumes a dish made with rabbit flesh once (or twice) a year. Mr. Leenaert proceeds with the moral hook by telling vegans that they must not express criticism of this – but also that they must be willing to label this “once-or-twice-a-year rabbit eating” veganism.

Moreover, if the violation of “this rabbit’s” rights is not sanctioned by the vegans and called veganism, then the whole deal is off – the omnivore, if not entirely satisfied, will do absolutely nothing for other animals from that moment on. Whatever has gone through this person’s mind in order that they contemplate the adoption of a largely plant-based diet is simply thrown out of the window if vegans refuse to say that infrequent rabbit eating is compatible with dietary veganism.

Then there’s another twice-a-year scenario. Vegan audiences are asked whether it may be possible that veganism (meaning, let’s not forget, only the adoption of a plant-based diet) would be more “attractive” if it “allowed” for the consumption of “non-vegan stuff” a couple of times every year. Actually, the twice-a-year figure was picked out of the air, so that number could be greater. Of course, the phrase “non-vegan stuff” rather hides the fact that the discussion is about consuming material gained from the violation of the rights of other animals. It is a consistent theme in a Tobias Leenaert presentation that the current, on-going, violation of animals’ rights are downplayed, dismissed, and generally made pretty-much invisible.

Things move further into the bizarre – and the totally unlikely of course – in a further hypothetical involving a rich person who’s apparently as keen as mustard to see vegans eating other animals. There are two set-ups here. In general terms, vegan animal advocates are asked if they would eat a “steak” if given €10,000 and, more precisely – not to mention remarkably more odd, would a vegan in a restaurant finish a half-eaten “steak” for a large amount of money after the original eater of the flesh feels unwell and departs the scene?

We may be hoping that these scenarios are to explore the weird psychology of the rich person who seems to get a perverse kick out of asking vegans to violate their own philosophical principles, but no – it’s just the hook Mr. Leenaert constructs for the vegans in his audiences. Moreover, the hypothetical is not designed to explore how the vegan might deprive the strange rich person of her money while slipping the flesh to a hungry dog she noticed outside the eatery on her way in. Maybe the hypothetical is designed to alert people to the fact that there may be something rather dangerous about the cooked flesh in question, thereby warranting the calling of health inspectors and not, after all, giving it to the dog?

Alas, no, this hypothetical is designed for one reason and one reason alone. Mr. Leenaert apparently likes to place vegans in contrived made-up scenarios where the most judicial course of action seems to be “eat the flesh.”

Finally, and as if to prove that these scenarios are drawn for the singular purpose of placing vegans in a bad place and nothing more, there’s the lasagne example. This particular scenario was discussed at length when Mr. Leenaert and I took part in a recent debate about our respective positions organised by ARZone. The sociologist in me was intrigued by this one. We are to imagine that non-vegan friends invite a vegan to dinner for the first time. Indeed, they are novices at making plant-based food but they generously go out of their way to get plant-based versions of necessary ingredients.

Unfortunately, somewhere along the line, a mistake is made and the lasagne dough bought and cooked is found to have hens’ eggs in it. What does the vegan do? Once again, in Mr. Leenaert’s presentations, the idea is not to get the audience to explore ways of minimising the problem caused if this scenario was real – or to take steps to prevent it happening. The hypothetical “wants” the vegan to be faced with eating hens’ eggs or face upsetting their friends who, apparently, no doubt about it, would be terribly upset and, moreover, put off veganism for life.

A short digression is in order here. Mr. Leenaert founded a vegetarian organisation called Ethical Vegetarian Alternatives which receives €165,000 every year from politicians who, Leenaert claims, believe that vegans, as a general matter, are “crazies.” In addition, in some presentations, Mr. Leenaert introduces his audiences to the “crazy vegan,” a person he mimics exaggeratedly scrutinising labels on jars, aggressively and loudly telling waiting staff that they don’t want a list of items in their food, and shouting in the street while wildly waiving arms in the air.

Personally, I don’t know vegans like this, although I imagine there may be a number of them somewhere. However, the point is, Mr. Leenaert seems to neither like nor trust vegans, especially those who try to be consistent in their vegan principles. Leenaert tells his audiences that, “consistency is overrated.”

Because Mr. Leenaert neither likes nor trusts vegans, he thinks it extremely unlike that all but a few (perhaps only one) has the grace and social skills to negotiate their way through the lasagne hypothetical. Vegan audiences are not, for example, asked to give examples of how they would diplomatically approach this dilemma, or tell others how they’ve been in this very scenario and found an elegant solution. These things are, apparently, way beyond the “crazy” vegan.

However, in contrast to the rather socially inept beings Mr. Leenaert thinks vegans are, isn’t it likely, knowing full well that many lasagne doughs do indeed contain hen’s eggs, that the invited vegan might contact their friend ahead of time to mention this fact, and perhaps offer the names of lasagne brands that are egg-free?  Of course, this is all a little “Captain Kirk,” getting out of a no-win situation by altering the rules of the game.*

However, the point I raised in the debate was that vegans, like most people, are skilled social animals, and they could well “head off” the lasagne problem, not least because it’s not hard to imagine that one’s friends could easily be caught out when buying the lasagne dough. In a very real sense, friends would simply be helping friends out. Of course, Leenaert would have none of it and came up with reasons why the scenario must be as he presents it: that is, the vegan is stuck with no other prospect than eating the product made with hens’ eggs or risking upsetting and offending their host(s).

One is left wondering why an animal advocate would go to such efforts to continually place vegans in such moral binds. He says it’s to critique the idea of “purity” in the vegan community, to combat “The Vegan Police,” and so on.

Personally, I think Mr. Leenaert is a vegetarian who has not quite managed to be comfortable with the dietary aspect of veganism (and, once again, he rejects all others aspects out of hand in the first instance), so he devises a version of “vegan” that includes the consumption of animal produce. He has a list of “exceptions” he either makes himself or advocates for himself and others, while seeking to convince his audiences that “flexible” veganism is actually the best (and fastest) way to bring about a (dietary) vegan world.

At a time when veganism is still not generally accepted as the moral baseline of the animal rights movement (another concept Leenaert rejects), we are ill-advised to move away from explaining the case for vegan animal rights (ripening people to the philosophy). This is certainly the case for active vegans. I challenge anyone to say that there is something more important in campaigning than to increase the numbers of ethical vegans (vegans) in society.

Vegans should ignore Tobias Leenaert. Let the more numerous vegetarians take part in and support his vegetarian, “meat” reduction, veggie-day, campaigning. There is absolutely no need for vegans to become involved.

 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru



Picture
1 Comment
Tvar
3/10/2017 12:20:51 pm

Brilliant.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Roger Yates

    Dr. Roger Yates is a rights advocate and sociologist

    Archives

    March 2023
    October 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    September 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015

    Categories

    All
    1980s
    Aaron Yarmel
    Ableism
    Ableist Language
    Abolitionising Single Issues
    Abolitionising Single-issues
    Alliance Politics
    Always For Animal Rights
    Amnesty International
    Anarchy
    Andrew Linzey
    Angela Barnes
    Angus Taylor
    Animal Aid
    Animal Equality
    Animal Liberation
    Animal Liberation (book)
    Animal Liberation Front
    Animal Pity
    Animal Rights
    Animal Rights Conference (Luxembourg)
    Animal Rights Movement
    Animal Rights Philosophy
    Animal Rights Show
    Animal Rights Zone
    Animals Property & The Law (book)
    Animal Welfare
    Anna Charlton
    Anthony Giddens
    Aph Ko
    AR2012
    ARCNews
    Arthur Ling
    ARZone
    A Sociology Of Compromise
    Autobiography
    Avoiding Unpleasure
    Award
    Backlash
    Barbara DeGrande
    Barbara McDonald
    Barbara Noske
    BBC
    Being Dogmatic
    Bernard Rollins
    Bloom Festival
    Bob Linden
    Bob Torres
    Brian Kateman
    Bristol
    Bruce Friedrich
    Buddhism
    Calf Food
    Capitalism
    Carl Cohen
    Carnage (film)
    Carol Adams
    Case For Animal Rights (book)
    Chris Powell
    Christie Davies
    Christopher Lasch
    CIWF
    Claims Making
    Claims-making
    Commodore
    Consequentialism
    Counterforce
    CRC Radio
    Critical Theory
    Cruelty
    Cultural Speciesism
    C Wright Mills
    Dave Callender
    Dave Wetton
    David DeGrazia
    David Lee
    David Nibert
    Declan Bowens
    Defending Animal Rights (book)
    Dehumanisation
    Depersonalisation
    Direct Action Everywhere
    DIY Politics
    Donald Watson
    Dorothy Watson
    Dr. Koichi Tagami
    Dublin VegFest
    Earthlings Experience Dublin
    Eden Farmed Animal Sanctuary
    Elizabeth Collins
    Elsie Shrigley
    Emotional Lives Of Farm Animals (film)
    Encouraging Vegan Education (EVE)
    Erik Marcus
    Ethical Vegetarian Alternative
    Eva Batt
    Fairness (concept)
    Farm Kind
    Faye K Henderson
    Federation Of Local Animal Rights Groups
    Frankfurt School
    Freshfield Animal Rescue
    Freud
    Friedrich Engels
    Friends Of The Earth
    Funding
    Funding Appeal
    Fur
    G Allen Henderson
    Gandhi
    Gary Francione
    Gary Steiner
    Gary Yourofsky
    Geertrui Cazaux
    Geertui Cazaux
    Gender
    George Herbert Mead
    George Paton
    Gerry Kelly
    Ginny Messina
    Go Vegan Radio
    Go Vegan World
    Govinda's
    Grassroots
    Hannah Arendt
    Hans Ruesch
    Harold Brown
    Harold Guither
    Hazleton Action Group
    Hazleton Laboratories
    Henry Salt
    Herbert Marcuse
    Herbivores
    Horse Ripping
    House Of Fun
    Howard Newby
    HSUS
    Humanitarian League
    Human Liberation
    Human Rights
    Human Rights Watch
    Humour
    Internet Age
    Intersectionality
    Interviews
    Introduction To Animal Rights (book)
    Irish Times
    Jackson Katz
    Jake Conroy
    James Rachels
    Jeremy Hess
    Jill Phipps
    Jim Mason
    Joan Dunayer
    John Bussineau
    John Fagan
    John Robbins
    Jon Hochschartner
    Jordan Wyatt
    Josh Harper
    Julian Groves
    Jurgen Habermas
    Justice
    Karin Ridgers
    Karl Marx
    Kath Clements
    Kathleen Jannaway
    Kay Henderson
    Keith Akers
    Keith Mann
    Keith Tester
    Keith Thomas
    Kim Stallwood
    Knowing Animals
    Language
    Lauren Ornelas
    League Against Cruel Sports
    Leslie Cross
    Let's Rage Together Podcast
    Linda McCartney
    Lynne Yates
    Macka B
    Mainstream
    Mammals
    Marjorie Spiegel
    Mary Midgley
    Mass Media
    Matt Ball
    Matthew Cole
    Maureen Duffy
    Max Weber
    McDonaldisation
    McDonald's
    Meat Free Monday
    Meat-free Monday
    Meat Reducing
    Media
    Media Sociology
    Melanie Joy
    Mercy For Animals
    #MeToo
    Michael Dello-lacovo
    Milk
    Milton Mills
    Moral Baseline
    Moral Maze
    Movement Crisis
    Movement For Compassionate Living
    Movement History
    National Animal Rights Association
    National Anti-Vivisection Society
    Neil Lea
    Neil Robinson
    Neville The VIP Van
    Newsjack
    News Quiz
    Newstalk Radio
    "New Welfare"
    Nick Fiddes
    Nick Pendergrast
    Norman Fairclough
    Numbers
    NZ Vegan
    Palm Oil
    Patreon
    Patriarchy
    Patrice Jones
    Paul McCartney
    Paul Sauder
    Paul Watson
    Paul Willis
    People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals
    PeTA
    Peter/Brigitte Berger
    Peter Singer
    Philosophy
    Piaget
    Piers Beirne
    Pigeons
    Pippa Evans
    Plague Dogs
    Plamil
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Pornography
    Poverty Of Ambition
    Power
    "professionals"
    Progressive Podcast Aus
    Prostitution
    Purity
    Rachel Carson
    Racism
    Radicals & Revolutionaries
    Radio 5 Live
    Radio Debate
    Rain Without Thunder (book)
    Real Veganism
    Reducatarianism
    Reducetarianism
    Resilience Of Orthodox
    Richard Adams
    Richard Gale
    Richard Ryder
    Rights (legal)
    Rights (moral)
    Rights (natural)
    Robert Garner
    Ronnie Lee
    Rosemary Rodd
    RSPCA
    Ruhama
    Ruth Harrison
    Sandra Higgins
    Scandals
    Sea Shepherd
    Sebastian Joy
    Sexism
    Sex Roles
    Sexual Politics Of Meat (book)
    Sex Work
    SHAC
    Simon Amstell
    Simon Redfearn
    Siobhan O'Sullivan
    Slaughterhouse
    Slaughter Of The Innocent
    Social-change
    Social-constructionism
    Socialisation
    Social-justice
    Social-movements
    Social-movement-theory
    Sociology
    Speciesism
    Stacia-leyes
    Stanley-cohen
    Stanley-milgram
    States-of-denial-book
    Stephen-clark
    Stephen-clarke
    Stephen Nolan
    Steve Best
    Steve-christmas
    Steve-kangas
    Steven-sapontzis
    Subjectsofalife
    Sue-coe
    Tavs
    Teagan-kuruna
    Ted-benton
    Thanksgiving
    The-animals-film
    The Bloody Vegans
    The-case-for-animal-rights-book
    The-now-show
    The-species-barrier
    The-vegan-magazine
    The-vegan-news-1944
    The-vegan-society
    Thrive Vegan World
    Tik Tok
    Tim-barford
    Tina Cubberley
    Tobias Leenaert
    Tom Regan
    Tom Warby
    Total Liberation
    Trafficking
    Turkeys
    Unnecessary Fuss
    Utilitarianism
    Vegan
    Vegan Buddies
    Vegan Education
    Vegan Education On The Go
    Vegan Information Booths
    Vegan Information Day
    Vegan Information Days
    Vegan Information Project
    Veganism
    Vegan Outreach
    Vegan Pioneers
    Vegan Pioneers Rock!
    Vegan Radio International
    Vegans
    Vegan Social Movement
    Vegan Society
    Vegetarianism
    Vegfest Express
    VegFestUK
    Victoria Moran
    Victor Schonfeld
    Video Talk
    Violence
    Wayne Hsiung
    Wendy McGovern
    World Vegan Summit
    You Caring
    Zami
    Zoos
    Zygmunt Bauman

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.