On Human Relations with Other Sentient Beings
  • Home
  • The Blog

Humans Atop the Scala Naturae

9/29/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
In issue 25 of Philosophy Now, Jane Forsey wonders what it is about human beings that makes us so special and important. “Can we,” she asks, “continue to rest easy in our claims to, or unspoken assumptions of, a privileged position over the rest of the natural world?” The suggestion of unspoken assumptions may seem odd and can be challenged, since humans appear hardly ever to remain silent for very long about how their species stands proudly “atop the scala naturae,” as Dess & Chapman put it.

Indeed, the socially constructed nature of conventional human attitudes about other animals implies an almost continuous social discourse on the matter. Essentially, Forsey wants to know about historical orientations to human exceptionality claims which speak of human beings being over and above the other animals. Human exceptionality is claimed on various if fairly familiar grounds, including:
  • (a) we have souls and so share in the Divine (and animals do not);
  • (b) we have free will and so can make choices (and animals cannot); and
  • (c) we are rational (and animals are not).

Such real or assumed factors serve and have served for a long time to morally separate humans and other animals, perhaps enough to create and maintain the “wide and bridgeless chasm” that Spiegal refers to: the same “sharp discontinuity between humans and animals” which Noske finds in Western culture and discourse.

Although Forsey regards Cartesian views as those representing what she calls “deep chasm arguments” concerning the moral status of humans and other animals, it is clear that even the “softer,” apparently more inclusive views embedded within animal welfare ideology allows the greatest interests of nonhumans to be “sacrificed” for arguably trivial human ones. Therefore, although animal welfarism can be logically posited as a position that tends toward the bridging of suggestions of a “deep chasm” between humans and nonhumans, species differences remain sufficiently distinct within the orthodoxy to allow the routine exploitation of other animals.

Sociologist Bauman claims that a certain degree of everyday human social activity involves erecting and maintaining boundaries - human beings do appear to like placing objects in neat, orderly boxes. 

A feature of the social construction of the orthodox moral view of human-nonhuman relations is the stock use and the preferencing of phrases like “humans and animals” to differentiate groups: all humans linguistically separated from all animals. Let’s have a look at some of the particulars of this routine, systematic and incredibly “useful” differentiation.

Start with God.

Ryder argues that early Christian views created a sense of human-nonhuman separation within the assertion that men and women could not be animals since humans were created in the image of “God” who had given only “their kind” an immortal soul. Such views explain why a good deal of recent animal rights discourse has sought to challenge this absolute separation and remind human beings that “we” too are animals.[1] However, even long before Darwin, it appears that there was recognition and acknowledgement that humans were indeed “animals,” although “developed” ones. 

Ryder states that “classical literature, Epicureans and writers such as Lucretius, Cicero, Diodorus Siculus and Horace had suggested that humankind had only slowly developed from the animal condition.” Aristotle, despite his insistence that humans, animals and nature were held in a “natural hierarchy of value,” never claimed that a human being should not be regarded as an animal. Later William Shakespeare’s Hamlet would describe humankind as “the paragon of animals.” 

Nevertheless, Ryder notes - using an interesting term - that a full awareness of our kinship with other animals was “intermittent.” Moreover, acknowledgement of kinship became “discouraged by the Church.” Therefore, it was [and remains] common for people to behave as though human beings were altogether different from animals: of a completely different order to them: indeed, “made in the image of God.” 

Reacting to this continuing tendency, many modern animal advocates began in the 1980s to use the phrase “nonhuman animals” to make it clear that there are such things as human animals (although it is interesting that this term itself is rarely, if ever, heard; and presumably not merely because it would be regarded as a tautology).[8] 

However, some campaigners have complained that the term ‘nonhuman animal’ can imply that the standard is the human one, which may further imply that nonhuman individuals may be regarded as much less important in comparison. Such people often favour phrases such as “animals-other-than-human” or “humans and other animals.”Piers Beirne reports that fellow criminologist Geertrui Cazaux uses “a clever, if obscure” acronym “aothas” (animals other than human animals).

Dess and Chapman remark that they were struck by jarring taxonomy in a radio broadcast they heard concerning the aftermath of a hurricane: “Not only were humans affected by the storm, birds and animals were affected too,” the report stated. Since birds, humans and other animals are all animals, why the malapropism, they ask.

They state that they realise that such routine differentiation is simply a version of an established linguistic convention. However, it is perhaps safe to say that when a linguistic construction exists long enough to become a firmly fixed convention, it is because it continues to hold meaning and/or utility for those (or many of those) who use it. Moreover, it is probably safe to speculate that very few fellow radio listeners would have registered the problematic taxonomy identified by these authors. 

Perhaps the central meaning of the common separation of human and animal categories may be correctly identified by Dess and Chapman when they note that, “In everyday parlance, animals means not, and less than, human.”[3] 

Thus, “The ‘animals’ in ‘animal hospitals’ are understood not to be human;” furthermore, the negative usage of “animal” is never far away: “the insult is clear in a snarled, ‘You’re an animal!’”[4] On the origins of these long-standing, firmly-sedimented, and socially-transmitted understandings, Peter Singer argues that Western intellectual roots lie in Ancient Greece (especially when the school of Aristotle became dominant) and in the Judeo-Christian tradition. “Neither is kind to those not of our species,” he states.

Alexander Cockburn’s advice about addressing the issue of the construction of human attitudes toward other animals is impressively clear: “Start with God,” he says. With a lively and belligerent style, Cockburn declares that, “The Bible is a meat-eater’s manifesto,” or at least it is after a mythical event known as “the Fall.” 

Until then, the story goes, hippie prototypes Adam and Eve were vegetarians, eating grains, nuts and fruit. But, as though she ran across a trippy Jack Kerouac novel, Eve could not resist eating from the “tree of knowledge of good and evil” and boy, have we all paid for that mistake. Cockburn explains what is said to have happened next:
  • Hardly were Adam and Eve out of Eden before God was offering “respect” to the flesh sacrifice of Abel the keeper of sheep and withholding “respect” from Cain the tiller of the ground. Next thing we know, Cain rose up against his brother Abel, slew him and we were on our way.

Thus began “Man’s” “dominionism” over and above creation. Genesis I: 26-28 reports the edict of the Almighty: “Man” was given dominion over the earth and was told to be “fruitful and multiply” in order to “subdue” the planet. Cockburn is right: we really were “on our way;” and it has been largely slash and burn ever since. Some Christian writers, such as Tony Sargent, seek to provide a far more animal-friendly account of common Biblical events,[5] and “animal rights theologian” Andrew Linzey is unflagging in pointing out that “dominion” really means “stewardship” rather than “despotism.”[6] 

Yet it has to be admitted, Cockburn’s account seems to be the popular version, commonly reproduced in accounts of the development of human attitudes towards the other animals. 

Moreover, “stewardship” sounds a great deal like animal welfarism which has rationalised rather than halted the human exploitation of nonhuman animals. Since it tends to organise the exploitation of other animals, Mason speaks of the “stewardship apology” in Christian cosmology.

That anyone actually believes in the existence of “trees of knowledge” and “gardens of Eden” is quite bizarre and, of course, sociologically fascinating; but believe it, and live and die by such “teachings,” many do. Several modern religious wars seem to testify to the fact that people earnestly hold such religious beliefs. 

Thomas Luckmann suggested in 1967 that religious belief go beyond church going. That religious teaching may remain influential in the creation of culturally-transmitted meanings, even in an increasingly secular world. Of course, people also believe in Captain Kirk and the Enterprise, Gandalf and Middle Earth, and Aslan the Lion and the Old Narnians, but less real blood has flowed from these fables. God-stories, on the other hand, have been instrumental in the creation of entire belief systems which people will kill and be killed for. 

Apart from a remarkable increase in human-to-human violence, Cockburn states that “the Biblical God” launched humans on the exploitation of the rest of the natural world, a world newly conceptualised as seriously “un-Christian” and “theirs for the using.”


  • [1] When I mentioned this theme to my sister, Lynne, a chemistry teacher and vegan since the 1980s, it reminded her that she had caused uproar in class when explaining the common ‘animal, vegetable, mineral’ formulation. She had used a picture of a human being as an example of the animal category. This resulted in several objections from angry students who declared flatly that they were not animals, and that they did not want anyone else to have the opportunity to call them one.
  • [2] I suspect that initial reaction to such a phrase would be to regard it as rather odd, rather than the immediate reaction to focus on the tautology. This, I believe, is significant in itself. In terms of the “truth” of the phrase, many may be quick to reassert “points of separation.” Take this, the very first words in the first chapter of Michael Haralambos’ introductory textbook of Sociology: Themes & Perspectives: “Human beings learn their behaviour and use their intelligence whereas animals simply act on instinct.”
  • [3] On April 28th, 2003, The Sun tabloid “newspaper’” featured a story (Stars Learn the Art of Survival) about a TV programme called “I’m a Celebrity…… Get Me Out of Here” in which the contestants must gut fishes and prepare chickens for eating. They may also encounter dangerous wild animals. Lembit Opik says of his “weathergirl” girlfriend Sian who was taking part in the program: “If she ends up in a scrap with an orang-utan, it’ll be the animal that runs off with a thick ear. She knows how to look after herself.”
  • [4] The particulars of the use of “animal” would surely provide an interesting area of research for ethnomethodological conversation analysists. For example, in April 2002 regular TV and hourly radio bulletins featured the comments of a police officer investigating the murder of a pensioner in the north of England. The officer described the killers as “animals” with such emphasis that the phrase was unusually striking. Enough that the editor of the animal rights magazine ARCnews was prompted to write to him with a complaint about the usage.
  • [5] Francis of Assisi appears to have based his compassion for animals on notions of indirect duties and animal welfarism. There is a story of a disciple who is said to have sliced off a pig’s trotter: Francis rebukes the disciple, not for the cruel act toward the pig, or because of violating rights, but because he has damaged the pig owner’s legal property.
  • [6] Journalist Jonathan Dimbleby featured on Radio 4’s farming programme on 22/7/2001. Dimbleby is a part-time farmer and, in relation to farming animals, he described himself in the programme as a “steward.”



0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Roger Yates

    Dr. Roger Yates is a rights advocate and sociologist

    Archives

    March 2023
    October 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    September 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015

    Categories

    All
    1980s
    Aaron Yarmel
    Ableism
    Ableist Language
    Abolitionising Single Issues
    Abolitionising Single-issues
    Alliance Politics
    Always For Animal Rights
    Amnesty International
    Anarchy
    Andrew Linzey
    Angela Barnes
    Angus Taylor
    Animal Aid
    Animal Equality
    Animal Liberation
    Animal Liberation (book)
    Animal Liberation Front
    Animal Pity
    Animal Rights
    Animal Rights Conference (Luxembourg)
    Animal Rights Movement
    Animal Rights Philosophy
    Animal Rights Show
    Animal Rights Zone
    Animals Property & The Law (book)
    Animal Welfare
    Anna Charlton
    Anthony Giddens
    Aph Ko
    AR2012
    ARCNews
    Arthur Ling
    ARZone
    A Sociology Of Compromise
    Autobiography
    Avoiding Unpleasure
    Award
    Backlash
    Barbara DeGrande
    Barbara McDonald
    Barbara Noske
    BBC
    Being Dogmatic
    Bernard Rollins
    Bloom Festival
    Bob Linden
    Bob Torres
    Brian Kateman
    Bristol
    Bruce Friedrich
    Buddhism
    Calf Food
    Capitalism
    Carl Cohen
    Carnage (film)
    Carol Adams
    Case For Animal Rights (book)
    Chris Powell
    Christie Davies
    Christopher Lasch
    CIWF
    Claims Making
    Claims-making
    Commodore
    Consequentialism
    Counterforce
    CRC Radio
    Critical Theory
    Cruelty
    Cultural Speciesism
    C Wright Mills
    Dave Callender
    Dave Wetton
    David DeGrazia
    David Lee
    David Nibert
    Declan Bowens
    Defending Animal Rights (book)
    Dehumanisation
    Depersonalisation
    Direct Action Everywhere
    DIY Politics
    Donald Watson
    Dorothy Watson
    Dr. Koichi Tagami
    Dublin VegFest
    Earthlings Experience Dublin
    Eden Farmed Animal Sanctuary
    Elizabeth Collins
    Elsie Shrigley
    Emotional Lives Of Farm Animals (film)
    Encouraging Vegan Education (EVE)
    Erik Marcus
    Ethical Vegetarian Alternative
    Eva Batt
    Fairness (concept)
    Farm Kind
    Faye K Henderson
    Federation Of Local Animal Rights Groups
    Frankfurt School
    Freshfield Animal Rescue
    Freud
    Friedrich Engels
    Friends Of The Earth
    Funding
    Funding Appeal
    Fur
    G Allen Henderson
    Gandhi
    Gary Francione
    Gary Steiner
    Gary Yourofsky
    Geertrui Cazaux
    Geertui Cazaux
    Gender
    George Herbert Mead
    George Paton
    Gerry Kelly
    Ginny Messina
    Go Vegan Radio
    Go Vegan World
    Govinda's
    Grassroots
    Hannah Arendt
    Hans Ruesch
    Harold Brown
    Harold Guither
    Hazleton Action Group
    Hazleton Laboratories
    Henry Salt
    Herbert Marcuse
    Herbivores
    Horse Ripping
    House Of Fun
    Howard Newby
    HSUS
    Humanitarian League
    Human Liberation
    Human Rights
    Human Rights Watch
    Humour
    Internet Age
    Intersectionality
    Interviews
    Introduction To Animal Rights (book)
    Irish Times
    Jackson Katz
    Jake Conroy
    James Rachels
    Jeremy Hess
    Jill Phipps
    Jim Mason
    Joan Dunayer
    John Bussineau
    John Fagan
    John Robbins
    Jon Hochschartner
    Jordan Wyatt
    Josh Harper
    Julian Groves
    Jurgen Habermas
    Justice
    Karin Ridgers
    Karl Marx
    Kath Clements
    Kathleen Jannaway
    Kay Henderson
    Keith Akers
    Keith Mann
    Keith Tester
    Keith Thomas
    Kim Stallwood
    Knowing Animals
    Language
    Lauren Ornelas
    League Against Cruel Sports
    Leslie Cross
    Let's Rage Together Podcast
    Linda McCartney
    Lynne Yates
    Macka B
    Mainstream
    Mammals
    Marjorie Spiegel
    Mary Midgley
    Mass Media
    Matt Ball
    Matthew Cole
    Maureen Duffy
    Max Weber
    McDonaldisation
    McDonald's
    Meat Free Monday
    Meat-free Monday
    Meat Reducing
    Media
    Media Sociology
    Melanie Joy
    Mercy For Animals
    #MeToo
    Michael Dello-lacovo
    Milk
    Milton Mills
    Moral Baseline
    Moral Maze
    Movement Crisis
    Movement For Compassionate Living
    Movement History
    National Animal Rights Association
    National Anti-Vivisection Society
    Neil Lea
    Neil Robinson
    Neville The VIP Van
    Newsjack
    News Quiz
    Newstalk Radio
    "New Welfare"
    Nick Fiddes
    Nick Pendergrast
    Norman Fairclough
    Numbers
    NZ Vegan
    Palm Oil
    Patreon
    Patriarchy
    Patrice Jones
    Paul McCartney
    Paul Sauder
    Paul Watson
    Paul Willis
    People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals
    PeTA
    Peter/Brigitte Berger
    Peter Singer
    Philosophy
    Piaget
    Piers Beirne
    Pigeons
    Pippa Evans
    Plague Dogs
    Plamil
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Pornography
    Poverty Of Ambition
    Power
    "professionals"
    Progressive Podcast Aus
    Prostitution
    Purity
    Rachel Carson
    Racism
    Radicals & Revolutionaries
    Radio 5 Live
    Radio Debate
    Rain Without Thunder (book)
    Real Veganism
    Reducatarianism
    Reducetarianism
    Resilience Of Orthodox
    Richard Adams
    Richard Gale
    Richard Ryder
    Rights (legal)
    Rights (moral)
    Rights (natural)
    Robert Garner
    Ronnie Lee
    Rosemary Rodd
    RSPCA
    Ruhama
    Ruth Harrison
    Sandra Higgins
    Scandals
    Sea Shepherd
    Sebastian Joy
    Sexism
    Sex Roles
    Sexual Politics Of Meat (book)
    Sex Work
    SHAC
    Simon Amstell
    Simon Redfearn
    Siobhan O'Sullivan
    Slaughterhouse
    Slaughter Of The Innocent
    Social-change
    Social-constructionism
    Socialisation
    Social-justice
    Social-movements
    Social-movement-theory
    Sociology
    Speciesism
    Stacia-leyes
    Stanley-cohen
    Stanley-milgram
    States-of-denial-book
    Stephen-clark
    Stephen-clarke
    Stephen Nolan
    Steve Best
    Steve-christmas
    Steve-kangas
    Steven-sapontzis
    Subjectsofalife
    Sue-coe
    Tavs
    Teagan-kuruna
    Ted-benton
    Thanksgiving
    The-animals-film
    The Bloody Vegans
    The-case-for-animal-rights-book
    The-now-show
    The-species-barrier
    The-vegan-magazine
    The-vegan-news-1944
    The-vegan-society
    Thrive Vegan World
    Tik Tok
    Tim-barford
    Tina Cubberley
    Tobias Leenaert
    Tom Regan
    Tom Warby
    Total Liberation
    Trafficking
    Turkeys
    Unnecessary Fuss
    Utilitarianism
    Vegan
    Vegan Buddies
    Vegan Education
    Vegan Education On The Go
    Vegan Information Booths
    Vegan Information Day
    Vegan Information Days
    Vegan Information Project
    Veganism
    Vegan Outreach
    Vegan Pioneers
    Vegan Pioneers Rock!
    Vegan Radio International
    Vegans
    Vegan Social Movement
    Vegan Society
    Vegetarianism
    Vegfest Express
    VegFestUK
    Victoria Moran
    Victor Schonfeld
    Video Talk
    Violence
    Wayne Hsiung
    Wendy McGovern
    World Vegan Summit
    You Caring
    Zami
    Zoos
    Zygmunt Bauman

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.